Confederates vs. the Union: modern American politics



As I was browsing my usual news sites, I came across an Al-Jazeera article on the upcoming US election. A map illustrated the current political voting trend (shown below), with states that usually vote Democrat demarked in blue, and states usually won by Republicans in red. Swing states (those states that may vote either way and are critical to both parties) are marked in yellow.  

 

Al Jazeera Map: 2012 Democrat vs Republican

My first impression was how closely the current political map resembled the division of Union and Confederate states during the American Civil War. So I skipped over to the Wikipedia entry on the American Civil War, and to my surprise I found nearly the same map...



Wikipedia Map: American Civil War 1864

On the Wikipedia map, red represents Confederate states while dark blue shows the those states that remained within the Union. West Virginia, Missouri, Kentuky and Maryland (light blue) were Union states permitted to own slaves. In the Al-Jazeera map, these states vote Republican (with the exception of Maryland). The vast mid-west is unrepresented (white) as they were not states in 1864, but territories.

Besides those "swing states" demarked in yellow, Kansas seems the only post-Union non-slave state to have bucked the Union Democrat/Confederate-Republican comparison, having switched from blue (1864) to red (2012).

Also of note, most of the states that were territories during the American Civil War (white on the 1864 map) now vote majority Republican.

While it may be tempting to draw a direct link between the  Republican party and its holdings of formerly pro-slavery/Confederate states, it is important to note that the first and perhaps greatest Republican -- Abraham Lincoln -- served the cause of the Union, not the Confederacy.

The demarcation lines regarding red and blue states have remained fairly consistent since the end of the American Civil War, which may leave us wondering "why the obvious and persistent divide"? What is the common ground between the Confederacy of the 1860's and modern day Republicanism?

Just a little food for thought...

 

13 Things I Found in my Filing Cabinet

1. Gulf War Trading Cards. Yes -- for real. My favourite was General Schwarzkopf, but I think I traded him for Saddam Hussein's WMDs.

2. Damned Drunken Bear.

3.  I have a feeling this guy had some pretty gay daydreams in High School. 

4. Overlooked in this article was that at the time of the escape the prison guards were preoccupied with an intense game of Twister.

5.  Long live the Islamic Republic! (that's a joke by the way for those in Homeland Security)

6. Just a few days after this picture was taken, this house owner won the Mega Millions draw.

7. This guy now drives the city bus. 

8. I just feel really bad for the girl in the white top. 

9.  The best arrest picture ever! Bet he posted this on his prison cell wall.

10. Leaflets dropped on Iraq by U.S aircraft back in 2003.  I really hope they could read English.

11. This is what really happens when they clone sheep.

12. Unfortunately I only kept the cover page. Would have made for some good bathroom reading material.

13. Last but not least, some dude with an RPG getting blown away by the Americans.

The Iranian-Israeli two-step

The Persians and the Jews have always had a volatile relationship. From Nebuchadnezzar's sack of Jerusalem and the forced exile of the Jewish people to Babylon in 586BC, to the fiery rhetoric of present day Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- the nearly 3000 year old rivalry continues even to this day.

You'd figure that time would have cooled the flames between these former powers. So what's all the kerffufle about?

Depends what government you ask. The Iranian diplomat will surely blame the illegitimate "Zionist Entity" for all the trouble. His Israeli counterpart will probably accuse the Iranian of supporting terrorism and meddling in the Middle East peace process.

And then there's me. I see the Iran's refusal to acknowledge Israel's existence as sort of the ostrich head in the sand deal. Even though the Islamic Republic's predecessor -- the Pahlavi dynasty (as personified by the Shah) -- was the first Muslim country to recognize Israel's existence, the ire of a specifically tailored Jewish homeland in what was viewed as historically Muslim Palestine was just too much for the new Islamic state to bear.

Sure there's those half-hearted comments by Khamenei and his minions calling for Israel to be wiped off the map; the Gaza-bound ships full of rockets and ammo intercepted by the Israeli Navy or the $400 million given to the terrorist group Hezbollah -- but deep down inside I'm pretty sure the Iranian regime doesn't really mean any of it.

And what about the good old days when Hebrew and Persian alike communed in the great halls of the Persian kings? Despite the Persian decimation of ancient Palestine and enslavement of its population in Babylon, the Jews eventually established a thriving community there.

Thanks to the likes of Daniel and Queen Esther, the Jews eventually won their rights as citizens there, including the right to self-protection and the right to emigrate back to the beloved city Jerusalem. The Torah books of Ezra and Nehemiah attest to this return. These rights were codified into ancient Persian law by Cyrus king of Persia, and a remnant of these Jews still live in Persia (Iran) to this day.

But the recent discontent with Israel is a curious one. While it is true that Iran is a Islamic Republic, it is not an Arab one. Israel's two geographically closest neighbours, Egypt and Jordan, are also both Muslim countries (and Arab), yet they have made peace with their Jewish Abrahamic brother.

So it appears that the row between Israel and Iran is not a nationalistic one, but a recent religious conflict. This is further highlighted by Iran's brazen support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, who also share a radical Islamic view of eradicating the infidel from what it views as occupied Muslim land.

And so the threats and accusations fly. The Iranian regime secretly arms its regional allies in their anti-Zionist resistance movements, and in response Israel blows up some Iranian nuclear scientist driving to work. Both nations deny any complicity in these covert actions, and both profess their innocence. But eventually things are sure to conflagrate.

The risks of Iran or Israel miscalculating and overreacting to the other's next move cannot be understated. The media bears constant witness to the international bluffing game between the two contestants – the Israeli air force flying practice bombing missions to show off its long-range strike capability; Iran testing out its short-range ballistic missiles only to be trumped by Israeli anti-ballistic missile tests; Israeli submarines deploying to the Red Sea only to be trumped by Iranian warships crossing through the Suez canal -- on and on the sabre rattling goes.

Israel fears a belligerent nuclear armed Iran, while Iran is angered by the ongoing Israeli “colonisation and discrimination” of their Palestinian Muslim brothers. It's a bit like two ants fighting over a dropped crumb of bread, all the while oblivious to the ant eater hungrily eyeing them from above. In the high stakes game of nuclear power versus wanna-be nuclear power, it is likely that the deeply ingrained ideological and religious beliefs of both sides will be the kindling for a future, horrible conflict.

But on the bright side, there's always room for improvement. Once upon a time these two enemies became friends, likely because they cohabited a common space (Babylon) and shared a common fate. They also benefited from the actions of a few wise leaders who took the courageous step of setting aside their differences.

Without moderate and realistic diplomacy, the Persian-Jewish two-step will continue its futile death dance. Israel will not disappear (unless made to by means of overwhelming and excessive force), and it is unlikely that Israel will ever remit its identity as a Jewish-majority nation. So the compromise that will usher in peace in this region will likely have to involve an accommodation of these two factors.

In days to come?

"The word of the LORD came to me: “Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshek and Tubal; prophesy against him and say: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: I am against you, Gog, chief prince of Meshek and Tubal. I will turn you around, put hooks in your jaws and bring you out with your whole army—your horses, your horsemen fully armed, and a great horde with large and small shields, all of them brandishing their swords. Persia, Cush and Put will be with them, all with shields and helmets, also Gomer with all its troops, and Beth Togarmah from the far north with all its troops—the many nations with you.

“‘Get ready; be prepared, you and all the hordes gathered about you, and take command of them. After many days you will be called to arms. In future years you will invade a land that has recovered from war, whose people were gathered from many nations to the mountains of Israel, which had long been desolate. They had been brought out from the nations, and now all of them live in safety. You and all your troops and the many nations with you will go up, advancing like a storm; you will be like a cloud covering the land.

“‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: On that day thoughts will come into your mind and you will devise an evil scheme. You will say, “I will invade a land of unwalled villages; I will attack a peaceful and unsuspecting people—all of them living without walls and without gates and bars. I will plunder and loot and turn my hand against the resettled ruins and the people gathered from the nations, rich in livestock and goods, living at the center of the land.” Sheba and Dedan and the merchants of Tarshish and all her villages will say to you, “Have you come to plunder? Have you gathered your hordes to loot, to carry off silver and gold, to take away livestock and goods and to seize much plunder?”’

“Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say to Gog: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: In that day, when my people Israel are living in safety, will you not take notice of it? You will come from your place in the far north, you and many nations with you, all of them riding on horses, a great horde, a mighty army. You will advance against my people Israel like a cloud that covers the land. In days to come, Gog, I will bring you against my land, so that the nations may know me when I am proved holy through you before their eyes."

- Ezekiel 38, written sometime around 620 B.C.E



*For a little background on this text, visit the ynet news website here. 

The Mao-Tag Man